🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.